"It's not the WHI results
that are shocking," Ahlgrimm says. "What's shocking is that millions
of dollars are poured into
a study like this. It's shocking that the health of 8,000 women was
put at risk by taking Prempro
for five years in this study, when we have known for more than
two decades that synthetic
hormones are not a good option for women."
Marla Ahlgrimm, R.Ph., founder
and CEO of Women’s Health America
and co-author of The
HRT Solution: Optimizing Your Hormone Potential
| May 2004 - Perimenopause
could cause serious first-time depression By
Marilyn Elias, USA TODAY
A woman's odds of developing depression for the first time increase greatly during perimenopause, a time of irregular periods and hormonal shifts before menopause, a landmark study reported Wednesday. Apr 2004 - Study
Plans to Retest Use of Hormones
Mar 2004 - Possible
Peril Found in Menopause Cream
Pro-Gest, one of more than two dozen creams containing natural progesterone, is a widely used alternative to synthetic hormone therapies that have been linked to a higher risk of breast cancer and heart disease. Millions of tubes of progesterone cream are sold annually. Mar 2004 - The
Menopause Market -- Salon -- by
Pamela Paul
Mar 2004- National Hormone Therapy Study Halted -- Nearly 11,000 American women received a letter from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) this past Monday explaining that the estrogen hormone therapy clinical trial they had been involved in was being stopped a year earlier than planned due to the unacceptable health risks associated with the treatment. Feb 2004 - SWEDEN -- Scandinavian scientists announced Tuesday that they have called off a study of the effects of hormone-replacement therapy for women with a history of breast cancer because early results showed an "unacceptably high" risk of recurrence. Their findings add to earlier reports that using hormone replacement to control menopausal symptoms carries significant health risks. Eighteen months ago, U.S. scientists abruptly ended the nation's biggest study of hormone-replacement therapy using the combined hormones estrogen and progestin, saying long-term use significantly increases the risk of breast cancer, strokes and heart attacks. In the Scandinavian study, half the women were on replacement therapy and the other half on a non-hormonal treatment. In the HRT group, 26 women had a recurrence or a new case of breast cancer compared with seven women among those who took the other treatment. Jan 2004 The North American Menopause Society Releases Position Statement on the Treatment of Menopause-Related Hot Flashes Treatment of hot flashes, especially those moderate to severe in intensity, has focused primarily on estrogen therapy. However, recent studies questioning the benefit-risk ratio of long-term estrogen use have increased the search for alternative treatments. Read more.... Jan 2004 Women Told to Avoid HRT:The Globe and Mail is Reporting: "Women should not take hormone-replacement therapy to treat the symptoms of menopause, except in rare instances, the Canadian Cancer Society said yesterday (January 8th) in one of the bluntest public health warnings yet issued about the controversial treatment." Read article... Dec 2003 Summing
it up for 2003? Read
report....
Nov 2003 Excellent!! Not by hormones alone: Women with questions about hormone replacement therapy are supplementing, or even replacing, pharmaceuticals with alternative treatments for menopausal symptoms Oct 2003 Very good
article from Better Homes and Gardens Menopause:
Staying Healthy Without Hormone Replacement Therapy
Sept 19, 2003 NAMS:
Increased Risk of Dementia in Postmenopausal Women on Hormone Therapy
Aug 8, 2003 Very good live Q& A with JoAnn Pinkerton, Associate Professor of Ob/Gyn and director of a Women's Midlife Health Center at the University of Virginia July 28, 2003 Doctors Trivialize Change of Life Symptoms, Menopausal Women Say A new J.D. Power and Associates survey of menopausal women released today finds that many women aren’t talking about their symptoms with their doctors, who often trivialize symptoms and leave decisions about treatment up to their patients. The survey, commissioned by the National Consumers League (NCL), surveyed more than 800 women not currently taking hormone therapy and found that, as the severity of menopausal symptoms increases, satisfaction levels with doctor-patient relationship decreases. Additionally, women surveyed reported that the perceived physical, emotional, and personal impact of symptoms increases along with their severity. July 21, 2003 Hormone replacement therapy has received some serious blows, but older women still have plenty of promising options for managing menopause. Forbes Magazine (obviously, we're still dealing with the financial aspects of hormones...why else would Forbes be interested in this issue?) July 20, 2003 Hormone therapy's rise and fall: Science lost its way and women lost out Boston Globe July 2003 A FLAWED CHOICE: Three women, three views on hormone therapy Miami Herald June 2003 Time to Forget HRT? Washington Post May 27, 2003 Hormone
pills now linked to dementia
May 2003 Hormone Therapy Not Risky for Heart Disease in First Year Apr 2003 FDA
Seeks Evidence on Hormone Pill
Mar 2003 FDA
OKs version of hormone therapy drug
Feb 2003... Rethinking HRT? Jan 2003... FDA Approves New Labels for Estrogen and Estrogen with Progestin Therapies for Postmenopausal Women Following Review of Women's Health Initiative Data NY Times says:
Oct 6, 2002...
Aug 16, 2002 ....
Looks
like everyone is taking this confusion VERY seriously.
The debate on the HRT report..............my original comments to subscribers in the 7/15/02 Minnie Pauz Newsletter....................... Ok, the news about HRT has everyone looking for information. Obviously, there are many different responses and reactions to the study, so I've tried to narrow the sources down to what I feel will give you an overall snapshot of who is saying what. I have a feeling it's going to take awhile for the dust to settle on this one, but just take a deep breath and relax! Nothing is going to happen to you in the next 10 min. if you are taking the drug used in the study! You have time to gather facts and opinions and then make an informed decision on what you want to do. After you have read about
the study from the following sites, you should write down your questions
and then make an appointment with your healthcare provider to find out
what their perspective is and to reassess your individual situation. It's
YOUR body and YOUR decision that counts!
START HERE The Women's Health Initiative Interview on PBS The JAMA The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Dee, What a great response to WHI. I will be attending a research conference with one of the primary investigators this Wed and of course the NAMS conference is in Oct. Your counsel is exactly what I am saying. Unless women are having an immediate problem, don't stop if it is helping you. Let's wait until some of the
hype clears and we truly know what the data means. HERS was hyped by the
media and some of the reporting was incorrect or was covered with biased
glasses. Certainly the data was a surprise and will give us greater room
to consider risk benefit options, but it shouldn't cause us to panic. GREAT
response-Thanks!!!!
The North American Menopause Society Response to the Announcement that Health Risks Outweigh Benefits for Combined Estrogen plus Progestin |
Results of 1st Poll ******************************************** http://www.blogsisters.blogspot.com/ ******************************************* ******************************************* ******************************************** In recognition of patients’
needs and demands, many leading medical schools are incorporating into
their programmes courses on alternative medicine, and hospital administrators
too are recognizing this growing trend. A survey of 3,200 physicians, conducted
by Health Products Research, found that more than 50% of physicians expect
to start or increase use of therapeutic alternatives outside the traditional
pharmaceutical realm over the next 12 months. Physicians’ perceptions are
that patients show greater acceptance of alternative therapies and therefore
compliance is likely to be greater. Most physicians continue to be sceptical
about some alternative treatments, mainly due to a lack of definitive clinical
evidence.
Quotes from various Doctors:
Dr. David Elmer, a Hyannis gynecologist ******************* From Dr. Susan Love's website..."Although HRT may be right for some women, the research to date shows little evidence that HRT is playing a key role in disease prevention, while risks associated with its use remain." *************************** Dear Dee, I appreciate your common sense approach to the HRT issue. And I agree that Humor Replacement is in order. The study has been placed on the front page and any qualifications, i.e. 26% increase in incidence of breast cancer has been known for years. Many interpreted this as an absolute 26%, which is incorrect. The breast cancer death rate was the same if you took or did not take HRT. Also, conjugated equine estrogens and medroxyprogesterone acetate were the two compounds (combined in Prempro). Estrogen alone was NOT implicated in increase risk, not is there data concerning the use of transdermal estrogen, transdermal progestins, or micronized progesterone. The take-home message: we should use medications for treatment of symptoms and treatment/prevention of disease when all the facts are in. The blind faith in cardiovascular prevention was called into question at least 3 to 4 years ago. I agree completely-talk to your
physician and find out what benefits and
|
All articles posted here are the opinions of
the authors!
Minniepauz.com does not condone nor condemn
anyone's personal opinion!